A Lesson in Record Keepin
aliko-aapayrollservices.com - Small businessess from 1 to 80 employees outsource your payroll management to us and let us worry about your payroll processing.
RSS Follow Become a Fan

Delivered by FeedBurner


Recent Posts

Tax changes to expect when you’re expecting
2016 Tax Tips for 2015 Filing Year
From Proprietorship to Corporation - When is the Best Time to Incorporate?
Tax Specialists Brief your Clients About CRA Fraud And E-Mail Scams
Bank of Canada cuts rates again

Most Popular Posts

Help your teenager build credit responsibly
Being an Executor of an Estate
Anti-Aging
Student Line of Credit
Principal Residence Exemption

Categories

aliko nutrition store- isotonix
aliko payroll services
canada revenue news and videos
canadian news
CPP ,OAS RRIF ANNUITY
Cross border Tax
Disability awareness and Benefits for disabled
estate planning
FINANCIAL LITERACY
HEALTH & NUTRITION
Home Car Insurance
Income Splitting Strategies in Retirement
INVESTING
kids and money -set your children up for financial success
life insurance
on line safety tips
online safety tips
PAYROLL
Real Estate - Investments / Retirement
RETIRE HAPPY BLOG
Retirement planning
SAVE YOUR MONEY
Save your money
SERVICE CANADA NEWS
small business planning
Tax Information for Students
tax news
tax planning
tax tips.ca
Tech news
TFSA

Archives

January 2016
July 2015
May 2015
April 2015
February 2015
December 2014
November 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013

powered by

MY BLOG

A Lesson in Record Keepin

A Lesson in Record Keepin
 
 
A Lesson in Record KeepinThe Income Tax Act requires you to keep all documents supporting your business activity; in an audit, the CRA will demand them.Keep Everything
 
According to the Income Tax Act, taxpayers must keep “records and books of account ... together with every account and voucher necessary to verify the information contained therein” for a period of six years following the last taxation year to which they relate. For corporations, the start of the six-year period is the fiscal year; for individuals, the calendar year.
Show Us the Proof
The recent appeal ruling in Tibilla v. The Queen before the Tax Court of Canada, July 3, 2013, reinforces the need to maintain documentation. In summary here is what led to the ruling:
1.        Mr. Tibilla (the taxpayer) acquired a rental property for $172,000 November 14, 2002, and sold it on December 18, 2007, for $285,000 but declared no capital gain in his 2007 tax return.
2.        In 2010, the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) advised the taxpayer that his return for 2007 was under review and that he was required to provide copies of the contract of purchase and sale, a statement of the capital cost allowance claimed over the years the property was owned, a list of any expenses related to the purchase and sale as well as the receipts for those expenses.
3.        In a late filing of his 2008 tax return, the taxpayer declared a capital gain of $41,571.64 and a taxable capital gain of $20,785.82 (i.e., 50% of the capital gain). The taxpayer said he was declaring the capital gain in 2008 because, despite having signed the sale agreement in December 2007, disagreements with the new purchaser made the sale “uncertain and incomplete” until March 2008, when the disagreements were amicably settled.
4.        Included in the taxpayer’s capital gains calculation was $52,810 in renovation expenses claimed to have been incurred before he actually acquired possession of the property (i.e., between April and November 2002). (The addition of this amount to the adjusted cost base would have reduced the capital gain when the property was sold.)
5.        The CRA rejected the renovation expenses because the taxpayer provided no vouchers. The taxpayer said he had stored the receipts in his basement but they had been lost in a flood in 2008. He was unable to explain why the existence and loss of these receipts had not been brought to the attention of the CRA during the audit, discovery or the appeal. The taxpayer said he had made no insurance claim for the loss because he did not want to increase his future insurance premiums. He therefore also had no documents from the insurance company attesting to his loss.
6.        The appeals judge ruled that the sale had taken place in 2007 since it had taken place by deed of sale before a notary on December 18, 2007, and had been registered in the official land registry the next day.
7.        The judge also ruled that the period between the date of purchase (November 14, 2002) and the date of sale (December 18, 2007) was not six years and, in any case, the Income Tax Act required the taxpayer to keep records of any claims until the expiry of the appeals process, which the taxpayer had not done.
8.        The appeal was dismissed with costs to the taxpayer.
The burden of proof for deductions lies with the taxpayer.
Lessons
Referring to other cases, the judge emphasized that, since our tax system is based on personal selfmonitoring, the burden of proof for deductions and claims lies with the taxpayer. Just keeping notes is not enough; documents are required. If Mr. Tibilla had been able to produce records of his renovation expenses (and if they had been accepted by the CRA), he would have saved himself a significant amount in taxable capital gains and legal costs. The addition of the claimed $52,810 in renovation expenses to the $172,000 purchase price would have given him an adjusted cost base of $224,810. His capital gain would have been $60,190 ($285,000 - $224,810) to give a taxable capital gain of only $30,095. Instead, he incurred a capital gain of $113,000 ($285,000 - $172,000) of which $56,500 was taxable. Mr. Tibilla’s inability to produce his expense records cost him $26,405 ($56,500 - $30,095) in taxable capital gains.
What about Your Past?
Prior to February 22, 1994, there existed a cumulative capital gains exemption of $100,000. If this amount was not fully used by the February 22, 1994, deadline, taxpayers could use any unused amount to revalue capital property. Effectively, the taxable capital gain on any taxable capital property sold thereafter would be reduced by the election amount of 1994. Documentation to support 1994 valuations may be required. Consider the following types of transactions that may need to be substantiated with adequate documentation years after they have occurred:
1.        If you purchase shares of a corporation from a third party, the adjusted cost base (ACB) of those shares will not be the paid in capital on the balance sheet. Shares could be purchased at different times for different amounts.
2.        If you have investments in income trusts, part of the monthly payments are usually return of capital which reduces the ACB of the investment.
3.        When calculating the ACB of a partnership, you have to take into account the partners’ taxable income, which is often different from the accounting income.
4.        Corporations that incur a non-capital loss may apply to reduce all types of income in the three taxation years prior to, and the seven taxation years following, the loss (10 years for taxation years ending after March 22, 2005). It would appear from the Tax Court ruling that application of non-capital losses 10 years back would subject the applicant to another six years of record keeping in the event that CRA wished to audit the taxable years.
As a result of the 2013 Tax Court rulings, individual and corporate taxpayers should consider the following:
·         Locate the original documentation pertaining to any capital property.
·         Review the record destruction policy to ensure you are retaining pertinent records.
·         Contact your lawyer, accountant, real estate advisor, appraiser or other professional to determine whether they have copies of any of your records that may be required. If possible, get the originals and leave them copies.
·         Keep in mind that professionals change firms, die, or sell their business to others. If your professional is no longer available, review past tax returns and statements to determine whether there are any issues that may require documentation held by their predecessors. Ask your current professional if they have documentation for the years in question.
·         Consult with your professional about losses and their applicability to prior years’ taxable income to determine whether the time and cost of a potential CRA audit is worth the dollars that may be recovered.
·         Establish a relationship with a CPA firm. Your CPA will be attentive to maintaining historical information.
·         Maintain originals of all documents. After all, as noted above, it is your responsibility to produce the necessary documents to support your claim(s).
Get It All Together
As you approach retirement and plan to sell the company or transfer ownership to others, you will need to have documentary evidence of past transactions to ensure any tax liability is kept to a minimum. Owner-managers should make reviewing the past and gathering the required information a priority
 
 
 
 
 

0 Comments to A Lesson in Record Keepin:

Comments RSS

Add a Comment

Your Name:
Email Address: (Required)
Website:
Comment:
Make your text bigger, bold, italic and more with HTML tags. We'll show you how.
Post Comment